Wednesday, May 27, 2009

LEISURE

What is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

No time to stand beneath the boughs
And stare as long as sheep or cows.

No time to see, when woods we pass,
Where squirrels hide their nuts in grass.

No time to see, in broad daylight,
Streams full of stars like skies at night.

No time to turn at Beauty’s glance,
And watch her feet, how they can dance.

No time to wait till her mouth can
Enrich that smile her eyes began.

A poor life this if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

We have heard a lot of this poem by W.H.Davies. But what is its application?

Who does not like to have some pleasure and delectation? But do we spare some time to see the beautiful idiosyncratic view of nature? The answer is negative for most of us. Whenever we ask a small child to sketch a picture, what does he do? He instinctively gazes into his mind and builds a beautiful bucolic scene which he scribbles. Everyone wants to spend some time with nature’s wonders; everyone wants to have some leisure. But the thing of concern is that most of us are oblivious of it; we merely forget it as we keep ourselves busy in our humdrum routine.
We ought to devote some time to savor nature and for that we must give short trips to the countryside once or twice a week; or even, if possible, everyday. Albeit we have artificial pleasure in our homes, we understand the true meaning of “leisure” during such trips to the agrestic side of the world. Usually, in the outskirts of cities, we have such places. Other than bringing leisure, natural sceneries are didactic too. For example, twilight indicates the time of the defeated, the losers. Per contra, daylight indicates the time of the exultant. The artificial circulation of air that we get from fans is not as pleasant as that of nature, the trees, the oceans, rivers, et cetera. So, what do we infer from this? NOTHING IS MORE DELECTABLE THAN NATURE.



[+/-] Show Full Post...

Monday, May 25, 2009

RCB rocks!!!(rocked)

the picture might have changed but i am still a fan of RCB

[+/-] Show Full Post...

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Summer Vacations (projects are a nuisance)!!!!!

Ho ho!!! Hurrah!!!! The summer vacations are on the way to begin. But there's no such reason for my exclamation. Goddamn projects!! They'll take the hell out of every one's life..Search the net, do this, do that, stick this, stick that- those shit have all fucked up in my head!!! There are no science projects (except Maths) and there begins my dole. No bio practicals, only drawings (don't take it negative); physics practicals and chemistry practicals complement some of the bliss; they are ike my "saviours!";



[+/-] Show Full Post...

Sunday, May 10, 2009

"Hike in fees????!!!!!! We will show ya!!!!!"

"Hike in fees? we'll show ya!" parents and guardians of some convent schools in Siliguri have lodged a lot of complaints regarding the recent hike in the school fees. The Chhatra Parishad had declared a strike on Friday. It is still not understood if Monday will be school. They have left every student panic-stricken. A meeting had been held among the heads of Don Bosco, SJS Matigara, Jermel's Academy and Nirmala Convent School. But it had failed. So was the cause for the strike to be called for an indefinite number of days. The "Protestant" movement put up by the guardians shall not go fruitless; I think so......Let's wait and see.......

[+/-] Show Full Post...

Friday, May 8, 2009

What is actually meant by SMARTNESS??????

Different people have different ideas or sometimes prejudices about this very word. Well, some say a stylish person (u know what I mean) is SMART. In fact, they mean that if one has good looks and moves in "style", then he or she is ought to be SMART. But they are completely of the wrong belief. Smartness actually means the ability to act in arduous and lugubrious circumstances at the rigorous minute.That's what is called SMARTNESS. But it does not mean that one can be shabbily dressed in an interview telling everyone that he is smart. Readers!!!! Send in your comments!!!!

[+/-] Show Full Post...

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Does GOD exist????

Yes, does God exist??? Most of us are theists.....but can they answer science? Think rationally???? The answer is no. Science deals with this ordeal in a straight forward manner; just ask the question:"can u see God????". If u can't, there is NO God, if u can see, there is God. But the latter is impossible. I am an atheist. People might ask me this question, "if u don't believe in God, so why r u writing the first letter in capitals????" That's indeed a great question!!! For the sake of every theist, I have done this favour. I can't be incongruous, u know..I must respect other's beliefs and follow the beliefs of SCIENCE simultaneously. That's my idea!!! What's urs??? Send in ur comments!!! watch this space for more posts......

[+/-] Show Full Post...

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Secrets Of Einstein


plz...readers, don't think that to be my "own" knowledge, but that has exactly been copied from a site!!!!


A man apart
So what was Einstein's secret? Lots of people have asked that question, and the answers are always unsatisfying, since even if we knew his technique, we wouldn't become Einsteins.

Einstein has earned his place in history for subtle, astoundingly accurate predictions that -- as we've seen -- are still being proven true eight decades later. Kip Thorne, a California Institute of Technology physicist, attributes Einstein's deep insight to his "conviction that the universe loves simplicity and beauty... His willingness to be guided by this conviction, even if it meant destroying the foundations of Newtonian physics, led him, with a clarity of thought that others could not match, to his new description of space and time."

Even though the popular picture of the scientific method shows a scientist building a hypothesis based on data from physical, not thought, experiments, Holton says Einstein was nevertheless using classic scientific method. "Hypotheses come from all kinds of directions. It depends very much on the particular skill of the person. Some, including Einstein, could visualize very well," and could interpret thought experiments quite effectively. Other types of scientists, he adds, "prefer their truth coming directly out of equations."

Although Einstein seemed to have a unique ability to peer inside the universe, Holton says he was also a great example to other scientists since he wrote about his experiences, philosophy and techniques. "This man allowed himself to be more public and frank, and in particular about his scientific method, which is very much the method still used by other physicists".

Although most of the great predictions growing from Einstein's work have finally been demonstrated, Holton points to one major exception: the "grand unified theory." Often called the holy grail of physics -- this single explanation would join all four physical forces under one umbrella.

For many years, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces have been explained by a single theory called the "standard model." Yet gravitation remains stubbornly outside the model, and that rankles physicists who think it must be concretely related to the other three forces.

Searching for the grand unified theory was something that Einstein, who died in 1955, "devoted 20 years of his life to," Holton says, but it still hasn't been found. Nevertheless, Holton, reflecting once more the physicists' preference for order, uniformity and simplicity, is confident that it will happen.

Summing it all up
If you've come this far and still feel you don't quite understand Einstein's ideas, you have good company. When the Nobel Committee awarded Einstein its prize in 1922, it honored his work in quantum mechanics and specifically excluded relativity.

And everybody makes mistakes. Einstein argued against the existence of black holes, which are now beyond dispute, and disliked the element of chance that underlies quantum theory, saying "God does not play dice with the universe." He also cooked up an unnecessary "cosmological constant" because his theories seemed to require a universe that was expanding or contracting -- a notion that seemed too weird. When observations by U.S. astronomer Edwin Hubble proved that the universe was expanding, he called the constant "the greatest blunder of his life."

But these are meaningless quibbles compared to achieving general relativity, which Thorne calls a kind of super-law of physics. Relativity is "not itself a law of physics," he writes, "but instead ... a pattern or rule which ... must be obeyed by all laws of physics, no matter whether they are laws governing electricity and magnetism, or atoms and molecules, or steam engines and sports cars."

Newtonian physics may still describe the stuff we see every day. But almost a century after a young patent clerk shouldered it aside with laws that apply to the whole universe, there's no question Einstein grasped the big picture. "All of our experience in the nearly 100 years since 1905 suggests that Einstein was right," Thorne maintains. "All new laws that have been successful in describing the real universe have turned out to obey Einstein's principle of relativity."

[+/-] Show Full Post...